2006VC-0153 SFC
PROPOSED ZONING USE PERMIT FOR PRIVATE
SCHOOL AND DAY CARE (ARTICLE 19.4.40) - 3,055.56 SQUARE FEET PER
PROPOSED USE PRIVATE SCHOOL AND DAY CARE IN THE EXISTING
CHURCH BUILDING 11,000 SQUARE FEET
EXISTING ZONING AG-1 (AGRICULTURAL)
R-3 (RESIDENTIAL) - Z63 -065 SFC
EXISTING USE CHURCH & AFTER SCHOOL DAY CARE
96U -037 SFC
LAND
USE MAP RESIDENTIAL
2 TO 3 UNITS PER
LOCATION
478 FEET OF FRONTAGE
502 FEET OF FRONTAGE
PARCEL SIZE 3.60 ACRES
SMALL AREA 604
LL 152, DISTRICT 9F
COMMISSION DISTRICT 7
OWNER THE
OUTREACH, INC
PETITIONER THE
OUTREACH, INC
REPRESENTATIVE MICHAEL HIGHTOWER
APPLICANT'S INTENT To obtain a Use Permit for a private school and day care in the existing 11,000 square foot church facility on 3.6 acres at a density of 3,055.56 square feet per acre. The applicant is also requesting a 5-part concurrent variance as follows:
Part 1 To allow the existing buildings and refuse areas to be closer than 100 feet to a residential district. (Article 19.4.40.B.3)
Part 2 To allow parking to be closer than 50 feet to a residential district. (Article 19.4.40.B.6)
Part
3 To allow the existing curb cut from
Part 4 To reduce the required 25-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback to the extent necessary to allow the existing structures and parking to remain along the south property line. (Article 4.23.1)
Part 5 To reduce the required 50-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback to the extent necessary to allow the existing structures and parking to remain along the east property line. (Article 4.23.1)
Department of Environment
and Community Development
Recommendation
Community Zoning Board
Recommendation
November 21, 2006
APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL: 2006VC-0153 SFC (ALL PARTS)
SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA:
SUBJECT SITE: The 3.60 acre subject site is located at the southeast
quadrant of
SURROUNDING AREA
The
applicant is proposing to operate an 11,000 square-foot private school for 125
students K through 8th grade and day care for 75 children in an
existing 2-story church structure on 3.60 acres at an overall density of
3,055.56 square feet per acre. The surrounding areas to the east and southeast of the
subject property are zoned R-3 (Residential), pursuant to Z63 -065 SFC, Z62
-008 SFC, R-4A (Residential), pursuant to 2002Z -0004 SFC, and CUP (Community
Unit Plan), pursuant to 2000Z -0155 SFC, and are developed with single family
residences. The area to the north is zoned R-3 (Residential), pursuant to 63Z
-065 SFC, and AG-1 (Agricultural) and is developed as
BUILDING SETBACKS
Article 19.4.40.B.3 of the Zoning
Resolution requires that all buildings and refuse areas shall not be located
within 100 feet of a residential district and/or AG-1 district used for single
family. Staff notes that the applicant's site plan indicates the existing
buildings and refuse areas encroach within the required 100-foot setback.
Therefore, the applicant is requesting a concurrent variance as follows:
Part 1 To allow the existing buildings and
refuse areas to be closer than 100 feet to a residential district (Article
19.4.40.B.3)
Staff notes that the church buildings were constructed prior to the adoption of the current development standards, and thus do not comply with the setback requirements. Staff is of the opinion that the variance would have minimal adverse effect on adjacent properties, and that it would be in harmony with the intent of the Zoning Resolution. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL CONDITIONAL of Part 1 of the concurrent variance request.
CONCURRENT VARIANCE
Article 19.4.40.B.6 of the Zoning
Resolution requires that parking areas shall not be located within 50 feet of
any residential district or AG-1 (Agricultural) used for single family. Article
19.4.40.B.8 of the Zoning Resolution prohibits curb cut access from a local
street. Staff notes that the applicant's site plan indicates that the existing
parking spaces encroach within the minimum 50-foot required setback. The site
plan also indicates a curb cut from
Part 2 To allow parking to be closer
than 50 feet to a residential district along the east and south property lines.
(Article 19.4.40.B.6)
Staff notes that the existing parking spaces were constructed prior to the approval of the current development standards, and thus do not comply with the setback requirements. Staff is of the opinion that given the parking spaces are existing, the variance would have a minimal adverse effect on adjacent properties. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL CONDITIONAL of Part 2 of the concurrent variance request.
Part 3 To allow the existing
curb cut from
Staff notes that the applicant's
site plan shows an existing curb cut from
LANDSCAPE STRIPS AND BUFFERS
In accordance with Article 4.23.1 of the Zoning Resolution, a 25-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback is required along the south property line and a 50-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback is required along the east property line. The applicant's site plan indicates that existing buildings and parking spaces encroach within the required buffer and improvement setback along the south and east property lines. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a concurrent variance as follows:
Part 4 To reduce the
required 25-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback to the
extent necessary to allow the existing structures and parking spaces to remain
along the south property line (Article 4.23.1)
Part 5 To reduce the
required 50-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback to the
extent necessary to allow the existing structures and parking spaces to remain
along the east property line (Article 4.23.1)
Staff notes that the church buildings and parking spaces were constructed prior to the current development standards, and thus do not comply with buffer and improvement setback requirements. Staff is of the opinion that allowing the existing structures and parking spaces to remain would not change the character of the area and would have a minimal adverse effect on adjacent properties. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL CONDITIONAL of Parts 4 and 5 of the concurrent variance request, and will reflect this in the Recommended Conditions.
PARKING
Article 18.2.1 of the Zoning Resolution
specifies parking for a school as follows: The larger of 2 per classroom or 1
per 35 square feet in the largest assembly. The proposed school will have 1,612
square feet of space in the largest assembly area requiring 46 parking spaces.
The applicant's site plan indicates 61 parking spaces exceeding the minimum
required per Article 18.2.1 of the Zoning Resolution. Staff notes that church
and school operate on separate schedules and there will be little issue with
overall parking demands.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The Environmental Site Analysis
Report is sufficient and satisfies the requirement of the Fulton County Zoning
Resolution. A field survey of the site was conducted by
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
In accordance with Article 34.5.3 of the
Fulton County Zoning Resolution, sidewalks, curb and gutter are required along
Staff notes that the applicant's
site plan indicates two points of access from
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
POLICY
On August 16, 2006, pursuant to 2006U
-0009 SFC, the Board of Commissioners approved the petitioner's request for a
Use Permit for a 20-student
pre-kindergarten through 8th grade private school in an existing
structure on Hutcheson Ferry Road, on a site zoned AG-1 (Agricultural),
Forestry, and Estate Residential.
On August 2, 2004, pursuant to 2004U -0005 SFC, the Board of Commissioners approved the petitioner's request for a Use Permit for a private school for 280 students on Burdett Road, on a site zoned AG-1 (Agricultural) and a Use Permit for a Day Care, pursuant to 98U -042 SFC.
On June 2, 2004, pursuant to 2004U -0005
SFC, the Board of Commissioners approved the petitioner's request for a Use
Permit for a 280-student private school in an existing structure on
In the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare, the Board of Commissioners may exercise limited discretion in evaluating the site proposed for a use that requires a Use Permit. In exercising such discretion pertaining to the subject use, the Board of Commissioners shall consider each of the following as outlined in Article 19.2.4 of the Zoning Resolution; Use Permit Considerations. Staff has reviewed said items pertaining to the subject use, and, offers the following comments:
(1) Whether the proposed use is consistent with
the Land Use or Economic Development plans adopted by the Board of
Commissioners:
Provided the applicant complies with the Recommended Conditions of this petition and the Use Permit requirements of Article 19.4.40 of the Zoning Resolution, the proposed 125-student, grades K-through 8th and day care use for 75 children is consistent with the following policies of the Comprehensive Plan:
Encourage development in areas where basic public facilities exist or are being improved, and discourage development in areas which would require inefficient or uneconomical extension of public facilities.
Provide for the transition of land uses from higher to lower intensity land uses.
Encourage development in areas where basic public facilities exist or are being improved, and discourage development in areas which would require inefficient or uneconomical extension of public facilities.
Institutional uses located in existing residential neighborhoods should adhere to established development standards as well as neighborhood preservation, transitional use and other Comprehensive Plan policies, in order to mitigate potential adverse effects.
(2) Compatibility with land uses and zoning districts in the vicinity of the property for which the Use Permit is proposed;
In Staff's
opinion, given the existing use of the site as a church and after school day
care and the nearby location of
(3) Whether the proposed use may violate local, state and/or federal
statutes, ordinances or regulations governing land development;
The proposed private school and day care use does not violate any known statutes, ordinances, or regulations governing land development.
(4) The effect of the proposed use on traffic flow, vehicular and pedestrian, along adjoining streets;
The proposed private school and day care will
generate an increase in traffic. Staff is of the opinion that the road
improvements specified in the attached Recommended Conditions will help to
mitigate any negative impacts from increased traffic in the area.
(5) The
location and number of off-street parking spaces
The applicant's site plan indicates 61 off-street parking spaces for the subject site. Staff notes that all parking spaces are existing, and that approximately 90% of the spaces are located on the interior of the site along the east property line. Staff notes that the parking spaces encroach within the required buffer and improvement setback for which the applicant has requested a variance. Staff is of the opinion that the location of the parking spaces would have a minimal adverse effect to the adjacent properties.
(6) The amount and location of open space;
The applicant's site plan indicates that most of the site as an open space, which in Staff's opinion would provide adequate open space for the proposed school and day care.
(7) Protective screening
Staff is of the opinion that although the applicant is requesting a reduction in the required undisturbed buffer, the remaining buffer around the perimeter of the subject site will provide adequate screening from adjacent properties.
(8) Hours and manner of operation
The applicant proposes hours of operation Monday through Friday from 7:30 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. for the school and 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. for day care use. Staff is of the opinion that given the existing use in the area, the proposed hours and manner of operation would not have an adverse effect on the surrounding properties.
(9) Outdoor lighting;
The applicant does not indicate any
outdoor lighting in association with the proposed private school and day care
use. Staff notes that Article 4.9 of the Zoning Resolution specifies that
outdoor fixtures shall be of full cutoff and shall be placed so as to allow no
light above the horizontal as measured at the luminaire, and shall be located,
aimed or shielded so as to minimize glare and stray light trespassing across
property boundaries and into public right-of-way in accordance with the
standards set forth for specific uses. Any exterior lighting that is in
compliance with the Zoning Resolution should not negatively impact adjacent
properties.
(10) Ingress
and egress to the property.
The site plan
indicates a curb cut on
CONCLUSION:
Provided Staff's Recommended Conditions are incorporated into the development of the site, the proposed private school and day care use is consistent with Board policies and the intent of the Zoning Resolution. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL CONDITIONAL of the applicant's request for a Use Permit for an 11,000 square-foot private school for 125 students grades K-through 8th and day care for 75 children. Staff also recommends APPROVAL CONDITIONAL of all parts of the concurrent variance.
COMMUNITY ZONING BOARD MEETING
On November 21, 2006, the Community Zoning Board recommended approval of this petition and all parts of the concurrent variance per Staff's recommendation. There was no opposition at the meeting.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
It this petition is approved by the Board of Commissioners, it should be APPROVED CONDITIONAL Use Permit for a Private School and Day Care (Article 19.4.40) subject to the following enumerated conditions. Where these conditions conflict with the stipulations and offerings contained in the Letter of Intent, these conditions shall supersede unless specifically stipulated by the Board of Commissioners.
1. To the owner's agreement to restrict the use of the subject property as follows:
a. Restrict the use of the property to a private school, a day care and accessory uses in the existing 11,000 square foot structure at a density of 3,055.56 square feet per acre.
b. Restrict the number of students in grades K-through 8th to 125. Limit the number children in the day care facility to an additional 75 students.
2. To the owner's agreement to abide by the following:
a. To the site plan received by the Department of Environment and Community Development on September 26, 2006. Said site plan is conceptual only and must meet or exceed the requirements of the Zoning Resolution and these conditions prior to the approval of a Land Disturbance Permit. In the event the Recommended Conditions of Zoning cause the approved site plan to be substantially different, the applicant shall be required to complete the concept review procedure prior to application for a Land Disturbance Permit. Unless otherwise noted herein, compliance with all conditions shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
b. Applicant shall be required to obtain a Land Disturbance Permit for sidewalks and road improvements prior to commencing operation of the school and day care facility.
3. To the owner's agreement to the following site development considerations:
a. Allow the existing buildings and refuse areas to be closer than 100 feet to a residential district (2006VC-0153 SFC, Part 1).
b. Allow parking to be closer than 50 feet to a residential district (2006VC-0153 SFC, Part 2).
c. Allow
the existing curb cut from
d. Reduce the required 25-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback to the extent necessary to allow the existing structures and parking to remain along the south property line (2006VC-0153 SFC, Part 4).
e. Reduce the required 50-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback to the extent necessary to allow the existing structures and parking to remain along the east property line (2006VC-0153 SFC, Part 5).
4. To the owner's agreement to abide by the following traffic requirements, dedication and improvements:
a. Dedicate at no cost to Fulton County along the entire property frontage, prior to the approval of a Land Disturbance Permit, sufficient land as necessary to provide the following rights-of-way, and dedicate at no cost to Fulton County such additional right-of-way as may be required to provide at least 10.5 feet of right-of-way from the back of curb of all abutting road improvements, as well as allow the necessary construction easements while the rights-of-way are being improved:
Dedicate 30 feet from centerline of
Dedicate 30 feet from centerline of
b. Reserve
for
Reserve 45 feet from centerline of
Reserve 45 feet from centerline of
c. Provide sidewalks along
d. Provide deceleration and left turn lanes per Fulton County
Driveway Manual at the time of application for Land Disturbance Permit review.
Traffic circulation design and existing curb cut locations are subject to the
approval of the Fulton County Traffic Review Staff during the Land Disturbance
Permit process.
5. To
the owner's agreement to abide by the following:
a. Prior
to submitting the application for a (LDP) with the Department of Environment
and Community Development, Development Review Division, arrange to meet with
the Fulton County Traffic Engineer. A signed copy of the results of these
meetings will be required to be submitted along with the application for a Land
Disturbance Permit.
b. Prior
to submitting the application for an LDP, arrange an on-site evaluation of
existing specimen trees/stands, buffers, and tree protection zones within the
property boundaries with the Fulton County Arborist. A signed copy of the
results of these meetings will be required to be submitted along with the
application for an LDP.
c. Prior to submitting the application for an LDP, the
developer/engineer shall contact the Public Works Department, Water Services
Division, and arrange to meet on-site with an engineer from the Surface Water
Management Program (SWMP), who is responsible for review of Storm Water Concept
Plan submittals.
d. Prior
to submitting the application for an LDP, the developer and/or engineer shall
submit to the SWMP, through the Development Review Division, a project Storm
Water Concept Plan. This concept plan shall indicate the preliminary
location of the storm water management facilities intended to manage the
quality and quantity of storm water. The concept plan shall specifically
address the existing downstream off-site drainage conveyance system(s) that the
proposed development surface runoff will impact, and the discharge path(s) from
the outlet of the storm water management facilities to the off-site drainage
system(s) and/or appropriate receiving waters. As part of the Storm Water
Concept Plan submittal, a preliminary capacity analysis shall be performed by
the engineer on the off-site drainage system(s) points of constraint. The
capacity analysis shall determine the capacity of all existing constraint
points, such as pipes, culverts, etc. from the point of storm water discharge
at the proposed development site boundary downstream to the confluence of the
receiving drainage course at a point where the drainage area is at least ten
times the proposed development site area and the next downstream drainage area
having a drainage area of fifty acres or more. The critical capacity
points shall be selected based upon the engineer's field observation,
professional judgment, and limited field survey data. The analysis shall
identify the downstream properties pre and post-development 100-year water
surface elevations, and for any post-development water surface elevation
increase exceeding 0.05 feet, the developer shall acquire the applicable
offsite drainage easement to accommodate the 100-year storm flow through
impacted properties. Where
e. Where
storm water currently drains by sheet flow and it is proposed to be collected
to and/or discharged at a point, such that the discharge from the storm water
management facility outlet crosses a property line, such discharge shall mimic
pre-development sheet flow conditions. A description of the method
proposed to achieve post-development sheet flow conditions shall be provided as
part of the Storm Water Concept Plan. Should the method to achieve sheet
flow across an external property line be unsuccessful, the developer shall
acquire an easement(s) from the point of discharge to a point down gradient at
a live dry weather stream sufficient to contain the 25 year storm flow or other
location as approved by the Director of Public Works. This condition will
not apply when the storm water management facility is designed and approved to
discharge directly to a stream or watercourse.
f. A draft of the Inspection and Maintenance Agreement required by
Fulton County Code Section 26-278 shall be submitted to the Department of
Public Works with the Storm Water Concept Plan.
g. The
Inspection and Maintenance Agreement shall provide that all storm water
management/detention facility outlet control structures shall be inspected,
photographed, and cleaned, if necessary, on a monthly basis, by the
owner. The Inspection and Maintenance Agreement shall require that the
design engineer shall prepare an operation and maintenance guidance document,
for use by the owner and/or any professionals retained by the owner, to plainly
describe the basic operational function of the facility(ies), including a
description of a permanent marker post(s) which shall indicate that the level
of sediment which, if exceeded, requires sediment removal. The Inspection
and Maintenance Agreement shall require an annual operation and maintenance
report for all storm water management/detention facilities be prepared by a
licensed design professional and submitted to the SWMP. The annual report
shall include monthly inspections, photographs, and documentation of the
cleaning of storm water management/detention facilities outlet control
structure(s) as well as an operational assessment of the facilities indicating
that they do, or do not, function as described in the design guidance document
(described above), and if they do not, a description of the specific actions to
be taken to allow the facilities to function as intended.
h. The
required Inspection and Maintenance Agreement shall be recorded with the Clerk
of Superior Court prior to issuance of an LDP, Grading Permit, or Building
Permit associated with the development.
i. The
engineer/developer is required to submit, along with the application for an
LDP, signed documentation verifying approval of the Storm Water Concept Plan.
j. Where
paved parking areas (including access aisles) are proposed to exceed 5,000
square feet, the storm water management facilities shall be designed to reduce
pollutants such as oil, grease and other automobile fluids that may leak from
vehicles. A general description, or concept, of the storm water
management facilities proposed to achieve the removal of such pollutants shall
be submitted with the Storm Water Concept Plan. A detailed design of such
facilities shall be included in applicable documents for a land disturbance
permit.
k. With
the application for an LDP, provide documentation (such as channel
cross-sections, centerline profile, etc.) describing the geometry of those
existing natural streams, creeks, or draws within the proposed development
boundary which in the design engineer's judgment are at risk of erosion due to
increased flow, provide a description of the basis utilized in judging areas to
be at risk, and provide details on the Storm Water Management Plan of the
post-development channel bank protection measures.
l. The
developer/engineer shall demonstrate to the County by engineering analysis
submitted with the LDP application, that the discharge rate and velocity
of the storm water runoff resulting from the development is restricted to
seventy-five percent (75%) of the pre-development conditions for the 1-year
frequency storm event, up to and including the ten (10)-year frequency storm
event.
m. Drainage
from all disturbed areas shall be collected and conveyed to a storm water
management facility provided as part of the development. The Storm Water
Concept Plan shall identify any proposed areas with incidental and minor
release of storm water not conveyed to such facilities, subject to the approval
of the Director of Public Works. Plans for any land disturbance permit
shall show all proposed drainage patterns for the proposed development after
its completion. Any incidental release of unmanaged or untreated storm
flows from any disturbed portion of the developed property shall be allowed
only with the approval of the Director of Public Works. Other than
minimal incidental flows shall be specifically approved by the Director of
Public Works. Bypass flows will not be permitted except from undisturbed
areas within a buffer or other protected easement. Final plans shall
provide for collection, conveyance and treatment of all approved incidental
flows from developed lots or parcels, individual residences or building
structures.
n. Storm water management facility(ies) volumes shall be designed to achieve water quality treatment, channel protection, over bank flood protection and extreme flood protection, in accordance with the Georgia State Storm water Manual, except that the duration of release for water quality treatment shall be 48 hours.
APPENDIX
COMMENTS ON PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES
NOTE:
Various
Road name:
Classification: Minor Arterial
Level of Service: C or better
Road name:
Classification:
Level of Service: C or better
Anticipated Traffic Generation Rates:
Average: 496 trips per day
Peak Hour: 138 trips
HEALTH DEPARTMENT:
This facility must comply with
the Fulton County Clean Indoor Air Ordinance.
The Fulton County Health Department recommends that
this proposed development be approved, provided the internal plumbing is
inspected and adequate for the proposed use.
If this proposed development includes a food service
facility, the owner must submit kitchen plans for review and approval by this
department before issuance of a building permit and beginning
construction. The owner must obtain a
food service permit prior to opening.
This
department is requiring that plans indicating the number and location of outside
refuse containers along with typical details of the pad and approach area for
the refuse containers be submitted for review and approval.
WATER AND WASTEWATER (SEWER):
WATER:
Anticipated water demand: 4,444 gallons per day
This project is within the
Comments: This information does not guarantee that
adequate water volume and pressure are available at this time or will be
adequate upon application of permits. Please contact the Department of Public
Works for more information.
SEWER:
Basin: Camp Creek
Treatment Plant: Camp Creek
Anticipated sewer demand: 4,000 gallons per day
The nearest wastewater pipeline to this project is onsite,
located in Land Lot 152, District 9F.
Comments: This information does not guarantee that
adequate sewer capacity is available at this time or will be available upon
application of permits. Please contact the Department of Public Works for more
information.
DRAINAGE:
Flood Plain: FEMA Map No. 13121C0344E.
Approximate floodplain = 0%.
BOARD OF EDUCATION:
No comments.
TAX ASSESSOR:
Property Tax ID#: 09F-3501-0152-004-1
Taxes on the subject property are
up-to-date.
FIRE MARSHAL:
Fire Station: Battalion 1, Station 1.
Impact: Will increase in 911 calls and
POLICE DEPARTMENT ZONING IMPACT
STATEMENT:
Beat: 27
Impact Statement on Beat:
Current calls for service: 11,011
Projected calls for service: Unknown
**** Current average response time: 9
minutes
** Increase in the number of residents: 22.0
* Increase in E-911 calls for service (police, fire, E.M.S.): 55.0
*** Increase in the number of traffic
accidents: 1.0
PROJECTED IMPACT ON DEMAND FOR POLICE
SERVICES:
It is the policy of the Fulton County
Police Department to answer all calls for service regardless of the impact of a
particular development. However, two of the most noticeable indicators of the
quality of police service will be as follows: As demands for service increase,
police response time to calls will increase. Time available for proactive
neighborhood/business patrol will decrease and crime prevention efforts will
decline.
The Police Department does anticipate a
significant impact on demand for police services.
* Based on 1998 population of 222,794
and 1998 total calls for service of 584,054 (194,242 for police services).
** Based on average single family
residence population of four, average apartment population of two and 1.96
persons per 1,000 gross square feet of space.
*** Based on 1998 accident calls of 8,009.
**** Based on average response time of 10.7 minutes
(North Fulton) and 8 minutes (
***** Based on average of two (2) cars per
single family residence.
Note: The demand for police service is
determined by socio-economic, legislative and other forces which do not lend
themselves to predictability. Therefore, projections are made from historical
data only. (There has been a 13.96% increase in calls for police service from
1996 to 1997)
EMERGENCY
SERVICES:
If zoning petition is approved there
will be an increase in E911 call volume.
The increase may negatively affect the Department's call answering speed
and service level.
Increase traffic volume without road
improvements may increase response times of emergency response vehicles thereby
reducing effective delivery of emergency services.
Addressing of all proposed properties
identified within the petitions must comply with the County's Addressing
Standard to reduce the likelihood of delay in response time.
City of
The proposed project is located
approximately 4.4 miles west of the Airport.
Is the proposed project located
under protected airspace for the Airport?
Is the proposed project located
within an area of significant aircraft noise exposure?
Yes No
If yes, is the proposed land-use
deemed compatible according to CFR Title 14, Part 150?
Yes No
For complete information regarding
the location of the property in question relative to aircraft noise exposure
and the aircraft operational environment please refer to the DOA NOMS
Developer's Pack on file at the